shades fills you in

A WSJ Op says reversing Roe v. Wade in Dobbs is all about reining in the power of the Supreme Court. Roe overreached

A WaPo Op doesn’t see it that way: The actual consequence is to deny women basic rights -- that’s plain terrible for democracy

This Reason Magazine Op, on the other hand, digs Dobbs: The states and their democratic systems should be the ones to decide on abortion! Thumbs down on a single federal court making that decision

But a different reason Magazine Op is concerned: Now, the government will be way too involved in (and spying on) women. This just increases gov power

The Atlantic: Ok, Fine, Roe was an overreach. But Dobbs was just as crooked. The Supreme Court just wanted to restrict abortion

The Cato Institute sees both sides: If you value a woman’s freedom, it’s anti-woman! If you value an unborn child’s freedom, it’s not!